WillPatching.com

The British Royalty is irrelevant these days: they are part of history and should be consigned to it.

Let’s look at some popular royalist mythology -

Tourists visit Britain because of the British Royalty:

No they do not. They generally visit Buckingham Palace to view the grandeur of the building and the related ceremonial traditions that are part of our history, such as the Changing of the Guard. How many tourists ever glimpse the Queen or even a minor member of royalty whilst visiting the UK?

Would the Changing of the Guard or any other ceremony be unduly affected if the Queen were replaced by a new, elected, head of state? Such as a President? It is strange how negative some of our cousins in the US are over this one considering they kicked our Royalty out centuries ago!

Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle contain a wealth of treasures, works of art and antiques, yet only a tiny area of each is open to the public. There are royal properties throughout the UK and most should be fully opened to all who have an interest in our history, as long as they pay a fee to enter. How much would that raise in extra tourist revenue? These amazing properties and their contents actually belong to the people of the UK, not a dysfunctional and over-privileged aristocratic family whose bloodlines are more Germanic than British. The Queen holds these treasure filled palaces as Sovereign on behalf of the nation and they are not her personal homes! Yet, she treats them like it.

The Royal Family does a lot for charity:

Not really. The Prince’s Trust was set up as a cynical PR stunt to give an unpopular, gawky youth a suitable image for the public. OK, it does some people some good, but it was the British Establishment that created the charity in his name. If you consider the amount of free time this particular member of our royalty has on his hands you realize he actually does very little for any charitable cause. In fact they all do very little. Period.

Their fabulous wealth is partly the result of royalty having paid no tax until very recently. Now the Queen and Charles pay a little in tax, but only voluntarily. They also benefit from taxpayers through the Civil List, although this is insignificant compared to the income and capital gains they enjoy from their ownership and stewardship of enormous swathes of Britain. Charles has not been slow to capitalize on his unique position by turning large areas of agricultural land into housing estates, despite his so-called green credentials. All for familial profit. And remember, he inherited these lands with his title, the Duchy of Cornwall.

If the Royals really wanted to help charity they could easily give up some of this property and pass on part of their immense wealth. Remember, that their money has been purloined from the people over centuries, with land seizures and the like largely at the whim of inbred psychopathic monarchs.

The Queen is the head of our Constitution and independent of government:

OK. So we change our constitution. It is plain wrong for a Head of State to be selected purely by genetic accident. The EU is chipping away at our independence and constitutional rights already, so it would seem like a good time to review the whole thing. And the remaining members of the Commonwealth are considering ditching royalty too.

They are a figurehead for the British/English to rally round:

I would feel very sad for my brethren if this were the case. Do we really need relics from an antiquated feudal system to pull us together? Prince Charles is flaky: he talks to flowers and cannot even put toothpaste on his own toothbrush. He needs a manservant for that. And the Queen’s Christmas Day Speech, which families used to gather round their TV’s to view, last year had just one in ten of the UK population interested enough to bother tuning in. This pompous speech is largely treated as a joke. Which frankly, it is. Along with the whole concept of royalty in this day and age.

They are out of touch and irrelevant. Most of us don’t give a moment’s thought to them. We should get rid of them.

Sources:
www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article435706.ece
www.thedukeofyork.org/output/Page4974.asp